How to “Reward” Your Users in a Social Media Environment: the Yelp Example

April 12th, 2007 by Sebastien Provencher

Having worked in the videogames industry in a previous life, I was intrigued by this blog post by Jeremy Liew from Lightspeed Ventures Partners. In it, he discusses how point systems can reward user behavior in social media and takes Yelp as an example.

Here’s an excerpt from his post:

Look at a typical Yelp user page

Yelp Profile Page

Note that each number (circled in red) corresponds to a user behaviour that Yelp wants. Most important of all is the number of reviews – in this case 26. But almost as important is that those reviews are of high quality – that they are Useful (45), Funny (4) or Cool (11). Readers of reviews can with one click rate a review as Useful, Funny or Cool, and this positive feedback incents users to write reviews that will earn the appropriate feedback. Another important metric for Yelp is Firsts (7) as this helps drive the coverage ratio of businesses that have at least one review. (…)

An interesting point to note is that while reviewers rate businesses with 1-5 stars, users can only rate a review as Useful, Funny or Cool. There is no option to rate a review as Useless, Lame or Boring. Thumbs up, but no thumbs down. Why the difference? I suspect its because reviewers drive Yelp . Positive feedback is more likely to drive more reviews than negative feedback. (One of the “compliments” that Yelp users can send each other is even more explicit – “Write More!”). On the other hand, giving a business a poor rating (1 star for example) won’t change their behaviour towards the site one way or the other, and it is valuable information to users. (…)

What it means: in the traditional business directory world, there are all sorts of promotions to incent the advertiser to “contribute”, i.e. be the first to advertise in a specific heading, add more content to his/her ad, etc. But not a lot of thoughts is being put into the user side of the equation. In a user-generated content world, you need to think about your user “incentive plan”. How will you motivate your user contributors? I am a strong believer in point systems as they put a numeric face on your contribution. A bit like your school report card. “Did you do well this year?” “Are you top of your class?”, etc. This motivates contribution. I suspect though that this system must create a pareto principle effect, with 20% of your users contributing 80% of your content. These are the people you want to identify and nurture.

Posted in Directory Publishers, Social Search, Social networks, User Reviews, User-generated content, Yelp, videogames | No Comments »

Tagging: Everyone’s Doing It! Are You?

January 31st, 2007 by Sebastien Provencher

The Pew Internet & American Life Project just released a new report about tagging. The survey has found that “28% of Internet users have tagged or categorized content online such as photos, news stories or blog posts. On a typical day online, 7% of internet users say they tag or categorize online content. ”

What is a tag?

According to Wikipedia, “a tag is a (relevant) keyword or term associated with or assigned to a piece of information (like picture, article, or video clip), thus describing the item and enabling keyword-based classification of information it is applied to.”

Who are the taggers?

According to the survey, “Taggers look like classic early adopters of technology. They are more likely to be under age 40, and have higher levels of education and income. Taggers are considerably more likely to have broadband connections at home, rather than dial-up connections. Men and women are equally likely to be taggers, while online minorities are a bit more likely than whites to be taggers.”

In addition, there is also an interesting interview with David Weinberger (co-author of the Cluetrain Manifesto). Asked “What started the current interest in tagging? He answers: “First, tagging lets us organize the vastness of the Web. Second, tagging is social.” He’s also working on a new book: Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder

(found via David Weinberger’s blog)

What it means: Those numbers are definitely higher than I thought they would be. Ever since I started blogging (a short three months ago!), I’ve discovered the power of tags. Not only do tags help organize your content, they help others find your content through search engines or other sites like Technorati or Del.icio.us. Coming from the business directory (”Yellow Pages”) world, I believe the future marriage of taxonomy and tags (folksonomy) will create a much stronger online categorization system. As more and more people start tagging content, any web site owner with structured data needs to allow their users to tag the information. BTW, David’s book seems fascinating. I wonder if one of my readers has received an advanced copy and could comment on it?

Posted in David Weinberger, Del.icio.us, Folksonomy, Social Search, Socio-Demographics, Tagging, Tags, Taxonomy, Technorati | 1 Comment »

Beyond Google: Social Media Engines First, Other Search Engines Second

January 29th, 2007 by Sebastien Provencher

Danny Sullivan from Search Engine Land dropped a bomb on the SEO world last Wednesday by firmly putting a new stake in the ground:

“…over the past few weeks, I’ve found myself more and more thinking that if you want to go beyond Google as a search marketer, the other search engines that matter first are the “social media search engines.” After them come the other major general purpose search engines like Yahoo, Microsoft and Ask.”

“Search marketers should tap into search engines — and that includes the social media search engines. Neil Patel’s Forget ABCs – The Social Media Alphabet Is DNRS (…) is an excellent introduction to some of these players, for those not up on social media search engines and social media optimization. (…) They are traffic powerhouses you can’t ignore.”

What it means: Wow! Social Media (Digg, Techmeme, Del.icio.us, possibly MySpace, etc.) are now considered to be the second biggest source of traffic after Google for certain types of sites (news, blogs, etc.). Which means Social Media Optimization (discussed in the Praized blog in November) should now be a key element of your traffic strategy. Are you properly leveraging these sites?

Posted in Ask.com, Blogs, Danny Sullivan, Del.icio.us, Digg.com, Google, Memetrackers, Microsoft, MySpace, News, Search Engine Optimization, Social Media Optimization, Social Search, Social networks, Techmeme, Traffic, Yahoo! | No Comments »

What’s More Important: Social or News?

January 17th, 2007 by Sebastien Provencher

I was just reading Scott Karp’s post about the demise of Findory, a personalized news service created by Greg Linden (which strangely enough I quoted in the Praized blog yesterday)

Scott cites Om Malik : “Despite being drop dead simple, Findory never realized its true potential as an information discovery engine. It has all the makings of being a personal memetracker, something a lot of folks have been clamoring for. In contrast the general purpose memetrackers that follow conversations, like Techmeme and Tailrank keep growing. ”

Scott then ponders: “I wonder whether the great success of TechMeme (and Memeorandum, Gabe Rivera’s other site on politics) and Digg , vs. the failure of Findory to catch on, is evidence that news is a fundamentally shared, social experience. Despite all the hype about the “user in control,” purely personalized news may be too much control, a slippery slope that leads to solipsism. The proverbial “water cooler” is symbolic of our fundamental need to share the news, to validate our experiences by sharing them with others. How can there be “conversation” if we’re all talking about something different?”He continues: “There’s also the advantage of constantly pushing the boundaries of your personal interests. Users depend on TechMeme and Digg to show them interesting content that they never would have thought would be interesting to them — it’s the power of serendipity and discovery that comes when you ride along with a larger community of interest. ”

He concludes by asking: “is news a fundamentally shared, social experience?

What it means: after realizing that social might be more important than local in the context of social local search a week ago, it looks like social might be more important than news in the context of social news sites. Has the Web 2.0 world unleashed a social genie? I strongly believe that the “discovery” element of new social media is a key success factor for any new venture in that field. Unleashing the value of the network becomes as important as unleashing the value of the content and it creates a killer combo. Aristotle was right: “man is a social animal; he requires the companionship of other men and cannot find happiness if he leads the life of a recluse. “

Posted in Digg.com, Findory, Local, Local Search, Memeorandum, Memetrackers, News, Social Search, Tailrank, Techmeme | 1 Comment »

What’s More Important: Social Or Local?

January 9th, 2007 by Sebastien Provencher

The blogosphere has been abuzz in the last few weeks about the shake-up in local search sites.

  1. Major lay-offs and resignations at InsiderPages (via TechCrunch, Local Onliner, )
  2. Same at BackFence (via Greg Sterling, Local Onliner)
  3. Change of model at Judy’s book, moving away from merchant reviews (via Judy’s Book’s blog)
  4. Resignations at TrueLocal (via Local Onliner)

Consensus seems to be that Yelp is the one that’s running away from the pack in that start-up category (defined IMHO as Local Destination Sites start-ups).

I will note a couple of excellent comments amongst all the buzz:

  • Greg Sterling said: I told a reporter on Thursday that winning in local “is like climbing Mt. Everest.” We’re now seeing attrition (or something like it) in local because it’s much harder to monetize local consumer destinations with direct sales than people think when they start out. That’s not to say building a great consumer destination is easy, but in many respects that’s the easier part.”
  • Uri L. commented in Techcrunch: “In terms of community social reviews – Yelp had the most successful model, which put a focus on the community interactions (pictures, “i like” features), and build around it the local biz reviews. The site design reflected the warm and cozy attitude, and was to young people (who are probably the most contributing sector to ugc). Insider Pages took a more “directory” style, cloning traditional YP with the added value of community. (…) Judy’s Book is somewhere in between, focusing originally on parents and 30+ sector. (…) However, it seems that Yelp has managed to come with the best model for Karma – “You review, the community loves you back”. In none of the other sites you could really feel “loved” as in yelp. Maybe that’s a thing to remember…”

What it means: Two things:

  1. Local/Social sites should come up with an alternative business model that does not depend on having their own sales force and instead should try to partner with existing traditional local media companies.
  2. I believe the social aspect might be more important than the local aspect when dealing with a site that combines the two.

Posted in BackFence, Business models, Hyperlocal, InsiderPages, Judy's Book, Local, Local Search, Social Search, Social networks, TrueLocal, User-generated content, Yelp | No Comments »

Five Social Search Sites: Yoono, Gravee, Jookster, StumbleUpon, Otavo

December 19th, 2006 by Sebastien Provencher

Bob Heyman covers five social search sites in MediaPost’s Search Insider (sign-up required).

“The premise (of social search) is that the next big thing is to harness the power of communities to generate more relevant search recommendations.”

1) Yoono “describes itself as “instant people-rated Web,” meaning, that when you surf, Yoono displays a list of Web pages that others have classified as “favorites.” It works with a toolbar or plug-in. See more in TechCrunch.

2) Gravee “is a social search application that differs from others in that it is trying to change the economics of search by sharing advertising revenue with content owners, with a rev-share business model. The site shares up to 70% of all ad revenues with the natural listings that appear on the same page when an ad occurs, as well as with the referring Web site.” here is TechCrunch’s take on it.

3) Jookster “is a community-driven social search tool that works primarily through the browser toolbar. Jookster collects photos, video and bookmarks from sites like YouTube, Flickr and del.icio.us into one place that can be searched, saved and shared with friends. ” Mashable covered their relaunch a month ago.

4) StumbleUpon “employs user ratings to form collaborative opinions on Web site quality with the goal of helping you “stumble upon” great sites. When you “stumble,” you only see pages that friends and like-minded “Stumblers” have commented on. ” Many people love StumbleUpon (they have over 1M users), see the description here.

5) Otavo “describes itself as not just a search engine, but a community of users and staff members who participate in your quest to find answers quicker. As an Otavo user, you can ask any question or seek a quest of your choice.” TechCrunch covered them a while back.

What it means: Not sure what to think of “social search” yet. I think it might work for a very specialized topic or as a recommendation tool but I’m not sure you can be become a truly successful generalist search engine using a community (unless you count Yahoo Answers in this category). of these 5, I had heard of Otavo (because they’re based in Ontario, Canada) and StumbleUpon. The later is generating a lot of good buzz and is already a great source of traffic for many sites. I wonder if social search is more a feature than it is a destination… It could be a great add-on to any shopping or directory sites (which is a little bit what Aggregate Knowledge does).

Posted in Del.icio.us, Flickr, Gravee, Jookster, Otavo, Social Search, StumbleUpon, User-generated content, Yahoo Answers, Yoono, YouTube | No Comments »

Next Entries »